Worth checking if “significantly reduced” is a case of the same misleading ambiguity covered here, as linked in this other article. (Probably)
A recent study.
Here is an analysis of the semantic impressions that the word “significant” seems to leave throughout the paper. I believe it exemplifies well a common misunderstanding, which some will find useful.
Additional comments on the study’s methodology and reporting are welcome.
Rhonda, hello. I’d like to email you something. Could you drop me an email that I can reply to? You can send to the one linked to my account here.
Good Sunday to you.