* Download comes with a free subscription to our newsletter. You can unsubscribe any time. You will not get duplicate emails if you download more than one report.

  1. 1

Vitamin D is a fat-soluble vitamin that plays key roles in several physiological processes, including immune function. Research indicates that people who take supplemental vitamin D are less likely to have acute respiratory tract infections. Findings from a new study suggest that regular use of supplemental vitamin D reduces the risk of developing COVID-19.

Vitamin D deficiency in the setting of COVID-19 can lead to over-expression of renin (an enzyme produced in the kidneys) and subsequent activation of the renin-angiotensin-system, a critical regulator of blood pressure, inflammation, and body fluid homeostasis. Disturbances in this system can drive poor outcomes in COVID-19.

The study involved nearly 8,300 adults enrolled in the UK Biobank study who had been tested for COVID-19. The investigators collected information about the participants' demographics and health status, use of vitamin D supplements (as well as other vitamins), and circulating vitamin D levels.

The authors found that people who took vitamin D regularly (daily or weekly) tended to be older, have better overall health, and to take other supplements. They also had higher levels of circulating vitamin D. Notably, they were 34 percent less likely to develop COVID-19 compared to people who did not take vitamin D.

Although this was an observational study and causation cannot be established, these findings suggest that regular vitamin D supplementation is beneficial in reducing the risk of developing COVID-19. The authors posited that the protective effects of vitamin D are attributable to the vitamin’s capacity to maintain cell junctions to reduce the risk of infection; enhance cellular innate immunity; or modulate the renin-angiotensin-system.

  1. You must first login , or register before you can comment.

    Markdown formatting available

  2. 1

    Very interesting but I note the 3 classifications used in the study were less than 25nmol/L deficient , 25-50 nmol/L insufficient and > 50 nmol/L sufficient. Or when converted to ng/ml would be 10ng/ml,20ng/ml and >20ng/ml but have any studies looked to see if additional protection was afforded with a level in the 40 to 60 ng/ml range ?

    This news story was included in a recent science digest.

    The science digest is a special email we send out just twice per month to members of our premium community. It covers in-depth science on familiar FoundMyFitness related topics.

    If you're interested in trying out a few issues for free, enter your email below or click here to learn more about the benefits of premium membership here.